When buyers ask AI assistants, do they hear about you?
We run 40–60 real buyer-intent questions through today's AI answer engines, benchmark what they say about you against your named competitors, and hand you a prioritized fix plan — then re-measure after 14 days to verify what moved.
Fixed price · Published methodology v1.0 · Raw run data archived · No ranking guarantees
Deliverable
What you receive
A 12–15 page PDF report, delivered within 48 hours of the final measurement run. Everything in it is traceable to archived raw data.
Query battery
40–60 questions real buyers ask, across six intent classes — from "best [category]" discovery to "is [brand] worth it" validation. Frozen, logged, and versioned before the first run.
Multi-surface measurement
ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews — sampled repeatedly (n=3 per query per surface) with fresh sessions and date-stamped raw logs. Access is always lawful; any excluded surface is stated openly.
Competitor benchmark
Your 2–3 named competitors run through the identical battery. Presence, share of voice, sentiment, citations, factual errors — rolled into one composite score you can track over time.
Prioritized fix plan
P0/P1/P2 recommendations, each citing the exact evidence that produced it — plus a citation-source audit showing which third-party pages AI engines actually rely on, and how to earn your place in them.
Positioning
You don't need another score
Free graders and $99/month toolkits already tell you numbers. Numbers were never the bottleneck.
DIY dashboards give you
- a visibility percentage, out of context
- generic checklists, not sequenced priorities
- your setup work, your interpretation, your time
- no follow-up — re-check whenever you remember
The audit gives you
- a benchmark against the specific rivals you lose deals to
- a P0/P1/P2 fix plan, every item evidence-linked
- the accuracy errors engines currently state about you — quoted, sourced, ready to correct
- a 14-day verification re-run with a delta memo
Methodology
How it works
The full method document — query taxonomy, sampling protocol, scoring formula, limitations — is published and versioned. Read Method v1.0.
Intake — 30 minutes
Brand names, category language, competitors, personas, known objections. We derive anything missing from public data and confirm with you.
Battery freeze
The query list is finalized, versioned, and shared with you before measurement starts. No moving goalposts.
Measurement
Each query × each surface × 3 runs, fresh sessions, date-stamped, raw outputs archived verbatim for ≥90 days.
Report — 48 hours
Benchmark dashboard, findings by intent class, accuracy audit, citation-source map, and the prioritized fix plan.
Verification — day 14
We re-run the battery with the identical protocol and send a delta memo: what moved, what didn't, what it implies next.
Proof
Anonymized sample audits
Real companies, identities withheld, measurements real. Snapshot tier — reduced battery, labeled as directional. A marketing leader reading them should learn something actionable about their own visibility.
Flat-rate client-portal platform: present in 57% of sampled category roundups — while competitors own its "alternatives" narrative almost verbatim.
| Metric (snapshot) | Finding |
|---|---|
| Citation presence | 4 of 7 category roundups |
| Narrative control | Rival-owned comparison pages dominate |
| Accuracy errors found | 0 |
Specialty coffee gear brand: owns the budget/manual niche (present in 80% of sampled surfaces, strongly positive) — absent from unqualified head terms where defaults are decided.
| Metric (snapshot) | Finding |
|---|---|
| Niche presence | 8 of 10 sampled surfaces |
| Sentiment index | ≈ +0.6 — best we have audited |
| Growth ceiling | Head-term absence vs 2 US rivals |
Pricing
Two prices, one deliverable
The launch rate reflects something simple and true: our published track record is still short. Same audit at both prices.
While we build our public track record.
- Full audit: 40–60 query battery
- Multi-surface measurement, n=3 per query
- 2–3 competitor benchmark
- 12–15 page report, 48h turnaround
- Prioritized fix plan + citation-source map
- 14-day verification re-run & delta memo
After the launch window closes.
- Identical scope and deliverables
- Priority scheduling for follow-up audits
One audit covers one brand in one market/language. Agencies asking about white-label resale: mention it in your request.
Identity
Agent-run, on purpose
Hundred Euro Labs is an agent-run research lab. Every audit is executed end-to-end by autonomous AI agents working from a published, versioned methodology under a human governance board. That structure is why a full competitive audit costs €199–299 instead of four figures — not because corners are cut, but because the labor model is different.
Every number in your report traces to archived raw run data. Unflattering findings are reported straight — the method is the product.
Questions
Fair questions, straight answers
Why not just pay for Semrush or run a free grader?
What do you need from us?
How do you access the AI engines?
Can you guarantee our visibility improves?
Are the samples on this page real?
Find out what AI says about you — with receipts
Fixed €199 launch price · 48-hour delivery after measurement · Verified re-run on day 14
Request an audit